The amazing thing about the so-called Global Financial Crisis for us Tasmanians is that many people are saying to me, “what crisis?”
Now that a full year of scary predictions has passed, many people who are 1) on welfare payments 2) employed by the public service or 3) wage-earners in relatively stable industries feel that their own quality of life is not in any real danger. After all, nothing bad happened to them in that scary 2008.
But consider the headlines:
This small sample of doom-and-gloom stories were published on news websites all on one day alone! (March 10, 2009). The avalanche of bad news shows no sign of abating any time soon.
So if mainstream news outlets are so focussed (infatuated?) with this oppressive rolling disaster, why do many Tasmanians struggle to see that life is any different at all? And what should be the Tasmanian response?
The first thing that has to be recognised is that the GFC is real. It’s happening and it affects every citizen in our global village. It’s true that Tasmania is less prone to the highs and lows than mining boom states like Queensland and Western Australia. Nonetheless, there is declining economic activity in Australia generally – and that means less spending, less sales, less profits and higher unemployment.
That’s bad news wherever you live.
Needless to say, the consequence of this is less money collected by the Commonwealth in three key areas:
1. GST which based on sales of goods and services;
2. income tax which is based on the number of people earning a wage; and
3. company tax which is based on company profits.
Unfortunately for Tasmanians, we are more heavily dependent on Commonwealth funding as a proportion of our state budget than any other state. Most of the Tasmanian Government’s annual budget comes from the Commonwealth. So Tasmanian Government services such as schools, hospitals, police and infrastructure are very highly subsidised by the rest of the country.
It’s not bad that we get that level of support. I’ve always advocated for us to get as much support as possible; and besides, there are stringent processes in place at the federal level to ensure that all states are given fair levels of support and disadvantage is a key factor.
But our dependence is unfortunate for two reasons. Firstly, because Tasmania continues to be seen as “disadvantaged” by our interstate cousins. More importantly though, during times when the national economy is shrinking – beyond our control or influence – we stand to lose out due to significant potential reductions in federal payments.
It seems clear that the Tasmanian Government will not be able to withstand these pressures without reducing its own spending. Without proper and careful management which seeks to find real efficiencies in current government spending (and cutting wasteful spending), valuable government services such as schools, hospitals, police and infrastructure will certainly suffer when sudden cuts have to be found in a hurry.
This will hurt every Tasmanian, even those who previously thought they were immune from the great global stuff-up started by risk-taking Wall St cowboys 16,000 km away.
It’s coming very close to home, and we need to be ready.
We need to review government spending and cut waste.
In part this means we need to make the public service a more productive and accountable entity. The State of Tasmania is one of the most expensive governments in the county, with its public service one of the largest per capita in Australia. Yes, we need government departments to be effective units to allow government decisions to be carried out as a force for good in the community (particularly for the more vulnerable in our community who rely on government support services). But no, we should not accept that ‘big government’ is better government unless it delivers for the common good and gives good value to Tasmanians who are footing the bill. I’m not an advocate for cutting jobs. I’m an advocate for accountability and productivity, ensuring that our public servants are given their due respect and that ordinary Tasmanians are not bearing the burden of a union-controlled Labor government which doesn’t know how to manage itself.
Government spending in areas other than employment have been exposed as excessive. There is a constant stream of ministers, ministerial advisers, bureau chiefs and polytechnic bosses travelling the world at huge expense as well as the Labor Government’s addiction to its expensive dozen-strong “media unit”. But the most galling of all is this Labor government’s obsessive love affair with building a new Royal Hobart Hospital (uncosted, but estimated to come in at more than $1,000,000,000). This is even though the community doesn’t want it, it would destroy the Hobart CBD and we Tasmanians simply cannot afford it. This is just another example of a State Government that is heading in the wrong direction and does not know how to set the right priorities.
We need to encourage an enterprise culture and remove unreasonable roadblocks to sustainable new industries being established.
Over the last ten years, Tasmania’s slack government, its outdated planning system, regulation and red tape has done the opposite of attracting sensible, sustainable, job creating development in our state. In fact, the Labor Party has though lethargy and abuse of process created a group of entrepreneurial ambassadors against Tasmania.
For example, I am thinking of Dick Smith who, after many years of trying to build sustainable eco-tourism facilities on his own land, was prevented at the last minute by vague and misty features of current planning laws. Our current system only guarantees one thing for significant, job-creating development plans: complete uncertainty as to what is allowed and what is not. Sadly, Labor doesn’t seem to care. Worse, the Greens love it because it gives them a negative platform.
In the words of Tasmania’s next Premier, Will Hodman, in his headland Agenda 09 speech responding to the State of the State address:
Now is the time to open our door to business and unlock our potential… I want government to get out of the road of small business to let them break through the barriers that have been holding us back…. Business is being strangled by bureaucratic red tape.
Right on! There is no need to chuck out due process and community expectation. We need to re-establish a coherent set of guidelines for different land types, communicate these to all concerned and then enforce them without fear or favour.
We need to reduce state-based taxes in areas which make us less competitive compared to other states.
Well let’s name some: stamp duty, payroll tax and land tax. Sure, they may well warrant some place in the state taxation landscape, but certainly not in their current un-competitive forms.
The problem is that the Tasmanian Government has, over 11 years of neglect, allowed its budget to become so dependent on these state-based taxes that they are seemingly incapable of reviewing them within any genuine reform agenda. Union control of Labor MPs together with this government’s crisis-driven political priorities leave necessary pro-enterprise, pro-employment reforms like these in the shadows of a previous century when the taxes were created.
No one should be surprised if emerging and/or sensitive industries decide to set up business somewhere other than Tassie if other states provide a more competitive deal. The Howard Government gradually reduced the Australian company tax rate down to the best international standard of 30%. Why? Well in the short-term it certainly did cost some tax-take, putting pressure on the federal budget.
However ultimately this measure alone saved countless businesses and jobs from going offshore and helped to secure the Australian economy. We Tasmanians must do what’s necessary to clear our own business blockages and commit to holding on to our enterprise magnetism. It can be done.
And finally, we need to convince Tasmanian families to reduce over-reliance on debt to pay for our lifestyle.
We need to teach our young people when they are still in school about how to be more self-reliant, how to budget, how to plan for long term goals and achieve them. We need to tell parents that they should not feel guilty that their children don’t have everything the neighbours have.
Let’s not forget that the Global Financial Crisis was founded on unsustainable debt; buying overvalued assets on unserviceable loans. We need to recognise that buying a plasma TV will look great on the wall, but will do more for the Chinese economy than our own.
Sadly, Mr Rudd is encouraging Australians to make a big mistake. He is wrongly teaching them that spending more money on consumer items is the answer to our financial problems here in Australia. My personal advice (and I warn you, I’m not a licensed financial planner!) to anyone receiving a $900 bonus this month: it’s your money – use it how you should not just how Mr Rudd tells you to. If you are smart, you’ll reduce credit card debt or other bills which are due. After all, if our households are sustainable, so is Tasmania.
If you haven’t got any such bills then please spend in a way that the money will stay here in our own community: then take yourself on a Tasmanian holiday, get some landscaping done, get your home repairs done, get your car serviced, buy some Tasmanian-made craft or furniture.
If we follow these positive steps, in years to come there will be more jobs and less unemployment; less debt and more savings; less hardship and more taxpayer-funded services in health, education and infrastructure to give us the quality of life every Tasmanian family deserves.
So, no one can afford to think there is no crisis. This affects all of us. But it’s how we deal with it that will determine how successfully we emerge.
The Liberal team, led by Will Hodgman, have new ideas about how to tackle the many issues facing us, including the GFC. It’s through leadership and vision instead of scandals, crisis-management and the politics of division.
I’m proud to be a part of that team and call on you to join us in our quest to unlock Tasmania’s potential and make it a better, happier place for every Tasmanian.
More at www.willhodgman.com.au



Hi Michael,
I am not wanting to “bash” the public sector either. Having dealt with Service Tasmania recently, they have a great frontline staff. What concerns me is listening to friends who have worked in big business in the private sector and now find themselves in government jobs. They find the levels of management in the government is astounding. There is little room to make any decisions yourself and everything must be checked off up the line many times.
Somewhere in between both sides of “working” (private and public), there must surely be room for improvement, even if it is 10% productivity rises in the public sector. Empowering people to make decisions and then backing those individuals even if they make the odd mistake.
People are the best assets of private enterprise and they shine when given reponsibility. If they are wrapped up in cotton wool so no mistakes can occur, then surely they stagnate.
If things were to change, then I would hope opposition parties and the media dont jump on first mistakes, but see them as a opportunnity for our public servants and state to grow.
Staff are human, Politicians are human, lets support them to get better at what they do and we will all win!
David -
thanks for your comments. you are right of course, although there is always the risk of throwing out the positive aspects of our somewhat combatative westminster system. Oppositions should support initiatives that are worthwhile and stop being worried about looking weak on such occasions. On the other hand, it would be a terrible development if governments always got their own way without being challenged/opposed/made accountable. This is why we need the watch out for the way the labor party and the greens continue to try to take over Tasmania’s upper house, the Legislative Council.
And frankly I think we are all sick and tired of the habit that the Federal Government has developed in always demanding that the Coalition and independents must give in on government legislation…
Also, i really appreciate your comments on humanising politics in Tasmania. For far too long now we have been putting up with an impossibly out-of-touch government which sucks up before elections and shows corrupt decision making and compromised labor MPs after them. There is room for error, apologies and even forgiveness. And i think when that room is made, Tasmanians all stand to benefit from more honest decision making and policies that really help make our quality of life the envy of the rest of the world.
No politician is perfect – so none of us should pretend to be!!
I don’t excuse dishonest behaviour but i would say this… Maybe the public and the media should be asked to not treat every slip-up by a minister or politician as a reason to bring out the gallows. We don’t treat other professions that way.
Your thoughts?
Michael.
This part of your article particularly struck me:
“We need to encourage an enterprise culture and remove unreasonable roadblocks”
I run a small business and thought to list it on one of the government’s business listing sites. This website is run by the Department of Economic Development and Tourism and is there – so I thought – to support Tasmanian businesses.
What an infuriating runaround I got.
I won’t go into the forensic details, but the end result was that I wasted many hours of time and my business still isn’t listed there. It was one of the most frustrating battles with bureaucracy I’ve had in my life.
They seemed to be trying to find ways of excluding my business, not helping it. I got the strong impression that no one I talked to had ever worked in business themselves.
And before me I also have a lovely form letter from David Bartlett congratulating me on the registration of my new business and highlighting all the wonderful support services offered by government. I look at that now and just get infuriated.
I don’t want to see “slash and burn” policies in government or anywhere else. I don’t want anyone to lose their job. But the bureaucray needs to wake up and be given a shakeup, and be reminded that their purpose is support Tasmanian business and the Tasmanian people.
G’day FBO
Join the club. I don’t think the labor government is deliberately making life more difficult for entrepreneurs and small business owners. It’s just that it’s now all too obvious that the care factor is pretty low. That’s probably because your average labor mp has never worked in anything that resembles a business. If we as a community don’t show some courage and confront the inefficiencies we have allowed to creep into our system, other states and countries will overtake us and it will be little wonder when more industries and significant employers dump large numbers of employees in favour of working somewhere else. While small business is smaller than big business, there is more employment in Tasmanian small business than in Tasmanian big business. That should cause us to wake up and deal with the “unreasonable roadblocks” I talk about in my article.
I promise that if/when I’m ever in a position to help deal with these problems that slow down job-creating business, I will do so and wear it as a badge of honour that I did.
Michael.
Michael
One of the primary reasons that people in the Tamar Valley are asking “what crisis?” is because the local economy is being sheltered from the global economic crisis by the construction of the second gas fired poser station at Bell Bay. This project will be ready for commisioning in about four weeks time. Then, as the work is wound down the spending in the Tamar Valley will be wound back and stark reality of the global economic crises will hit home.
This raises two interesting points. Firstly, the only real way to invigorate the economy in the current climate is direct govenment funding at infrastructure projects that will be needed when the world recovers.
Secondly, it shows how the Gunns Pulp Mill will be like a godsend, to not only the Tamar Valley but to the whole of Tasmania. It will provide the buffer that will allow us to ride out the global situation and be ready for the recovery.
Hey very nice blog!! Man .. Beautiful .. Amazing .. I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds also…
Hey SDP,
thanks for that, my team and i have put a lot of thought and work into it! Mate, how does a plumber from San Diego manage to find this site?? amazing.
Michael
Hi Michael,
whilst I am not in your electorate, I absolutely appreciate you giving Tasmanians the opportunity to liaise with you openly & directly with input involving the direction of the State that we love so much.
As I write this I am one of over 700 public servants who’ve given dedicated & often passionate service to the Government as part of a Department which apparantly no longer exists.
Over the last few years I have also been personally involved in another 3 similar Departmental “shuffling of the deckchairs”, and I can pass on from personal experience that this sort of treatment of professional workers has contributed to possibly an all time low in morale & faith in the Goverment amongst Public Servants.
Michael, we are real people, with real lives & families, and I would ask you to pass on this thought to your party & to Will Hodgeman. If you are given the opportunity, please treat the Public Sector workers as people, involve us in any decisions that impact on us, our jobs & our lives. Please don’t treat us like cattle, to be shifted around at will to the whims of ministers & recommendations of Treasury toe – cutters.
Do this, & the Public Service will support the State with exceptional service. Continue as the current Government as done & it will be little wonder if the “don’t care” attitude starts to permeate through the Service.
Dear Michael
Your article pretty well mirrors my thoughts on the need to review spending and cut waste. I wonder how you will be able to achieve something concrete to demonstrate effectiveness at reducing spending.
With reduced spending a reduction in state based taxes should be possible. I’m only joking as reality sets in and I can’t ever imagine a government spending less. Maybe you can enlighten me as to how you would work to achieve less spending.
Regards
Chuckboleg